Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2-positive psychiatric in-patients: A case-control study in the psychiatric wards of a Great Metropolitan Hospital in Milan.

During the first Covid-19 outbreak, the Niguarda Hospital of Milan featured two Psychiatry wards, one for SARS-CoV-2 positive patient and one for patients requiring hospitalization and negative for SARS-CoV-2. The two groups of patients were compared and were similar in distribution of psychiatric diagnosis, duration of illness and previous hospitalizations. SARS-CoV-2 positive participants had a lower severity of symptoms both at admission and discharge, a lower frequency of psychotic symptoms and substance intoxication at admission. These findings suggest that patients admitted to the COVID ward were hospitalized not only for their mental health condition but also because of the infection.

Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics during the COVID-19 pandemic in schizophrenia: An observational study in a real-world clinical setting.

The COVID-19 pandemic is having an important impact on the practice of mental health services and on schizophrenia patients, and heterogeneous and conflicting findings are being reported on the reduction of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics use. Aims of the study were to assess the total number of patients treated with LAI, the start of novel LAI and the discontinuation of LAI treatments, analyzing register data of the first year of the pandemic, 2020, compared to a pre-pandemic reference year, 2019. Data from two outpatient centers were retrieved, for a total of 236 participants in 2020: no significant differences were observed comparing 2020 and 2019 when considering the total number of patients on LAI treatment (p = 0.890) and the number of dropouts (p = 0.262); however, a significant reduction in the start of LAI was observed (p = 0.022). In 2020, second generation LAI were more prescribed than first generation LAI (p = 0.040) while no difference was observed in 2019 (p = 0.191). These findings attest the efficacy of measures adopted in mental health services to face the consequences of COVID-19 and shed further light on the impact of the pandemic on the clinical practice of mental health services and on the continuity of care of people with schizophrenia.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on the clinical response to dupilumab treatment and the psychological status of non-infected atopic patients.

Dupilumab is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis and was found to improve results of clinician- and patient-oriented tests with relevant benefits across multiple domains related to the disease. To investigate the effects of significant psychological stress on clinician- and patient-oriented tests for severe AD patients treated with dupilumab. Patients were investigated before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown in a severely affected area. Forty-five adult patients suffering from severe AD were enrolled. Clinician-oriented (EASI, SCORAD and NRS scores for sleep loss and itching) and patient-oriented tests (DLQI, POEM and HADS) were administered at baseline (T0) and after 16 (T1) and 24 (T2) weeks. The T2 examination took place just before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. A further examination took place at 32 weeks (T3) during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. In comparison to baseline, dupilumab treatment rapidly improved the scores of all tests. After this, the pandemic and lockdown started, and scores of clinician-oriented tests remained almost stable, while patient-oriented scores markedly deteriorated, although they remained better than at baseline. Some personal and social situations seemed to be linked to a worse result. Despite dupilumab being effective in inducing and maintaining clinical remission of AD, the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown significantly impaired patients' perception of the disease, quality of life and anxiety and/or depression. However, this psychological status did not modify the therapeutic response to dupilumab.